Rethink
After having time to ponder the ideas further for the full stretch they could have, a few quite important thoughts came to light.
Self promotion project: Last year this was the clear winner for double project, however it became at a disadvantage on the discovery of the creative professional practice module. Theres still much that can be done for self promotion, however the identity design assessment for the cpp module is in semester 2. A planning knightmare, honestly i can't quite get my head around.
Amir project: What possibilities, a very good project to be onboard, but in control, excellent.
Plenty of tasks for a double project. A couple of negatives I have on mind. Firstly the client Dr M.Amir is a associate, whom I have already done some work for, hes tough but educational to work along side with, the problem is that he is my doctor. I'm not aware if there is any breaches there or thin boundaries? Secondly and harder to define would be the clients copyright status and how it ties into ownership, am I right to believe any work you produce within university the university own or have some power over?
Design for learning: When I saw this module my opinion of it, was much of fright, a very large research based module. then when I found out that this wasnt part of my 3rd year, I was surprisingly disappointed, gutted even. I had to include it on my list, a real challenge but real worthwhile. Problem, the artifact will have to be completed sooner than the modules plan in order to test and evaluate the artifact.
Self promotion project: Last year this was the clear winner for double project, however it became at a disadvantage on the discovery of the creative professional practice module. Theres still much that can be done for self promotion, however the identity design assessment for the cpp module is in semester 2. A planning knightmare, honestly i can't quite get my head around.
Amir project: What possibilities, a very good project to be onboard, but in control, excellent.
Plenty of tasks for a double project. A couple of negatives I have on mind. Firstly the client Dr M.Amir is a associate, whom I have already done some work for, hes tough but educational to work along side with, the problem is that he is my doctor. I'm not aware if there is any breaches there or thin boundaries? Secondly and harder to define would be the clients copyright status and how it ties into ownership, am I right to believe any work you produce within university the university own or have some power over?
Design for learning: When I saw this module my opinion of it, was much of fright, a very large research based module. then when I found out that this wasnt part of my 3rd year, I was surprisingly disappointed, gutted even. I had to include it on my list, a real challenge but real worthwhile. Problem, the artifact will have to be completed sooner than the modules plan in order to test and evaluate the artifact.
posted by katie kaboom at 5:30 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home